Links
Data Sites
- American Research Group
- Annenberg Public Policy Center
- Cold Hearted Truth
- Computational Politics
- Cook Political Report
- CQ Politics
- D.C.s Political Report
- Election Futures Market
- Election Prediction
- Election Projection
- Electoral-vote.com
- Field Poll (California)
- Five Thirty Eight
- Forum Journal - Applied Research in Contemporary Politics
- Gallup Research
- Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research
- Harris Interactive
- Hedgehog Report
- House Race Tracker
- Intrade Prediction market
- ISPOS News Center
- Larry Sabato's Crystal Ball
- Mason-Dixon Polls
- Majority Watch 06 House Polls
- Pew Research Center
- Political Arithmetik
- Polling Report
- Pollster.com (Mystery Pollster)
- Professor Pollkatz
- Princeton Election Consortium
- Quinnipiac
- Presidential Electoral College Predictions
- Race 2004 State Polls
- Rasmussen Reports
- Roper Organization
- Rothenberg Political Report
- Survey USA
- Statistical Modeling (Andrew Gelmen Blog)
- Swing State Project
- TPM Cafe Election Central
- 270 to win
- United States Election Project
- U.S. Election Atlas
- World Election Data
- Zogby International
My Favorite Blogs (Left to Right)
- Atrios
- Open Left
- My DD
- Daily Kos
- Talking Points Memo
- Political Wire
- Andrew Sullivan
- Real Clear Politics
- Red State
Archives
The application of statistical analysis, mathematical modeling, game theory and other quantitative scientific methods to explore political phenomena.
Wednesday, October 27, 2004
Projection 10/27 8:30 PM
Kerry 58,623,000 50.0% 291 EV
Bush 56,653,000 48.4% 247 EV
Other 1,872,000 1.6%
click here for electoral map
Probability Bush wins each state:
WI 20.3%
IA 33.1%
NM 34.6%
FL 37.3%
OH 56.8%
NV 75.7%
Overall Winning Probability:
Kerry 76.7% Bush 23.3%
Today showed continued improvement for Kerry in the battleground while national numbers remained flat. PA, one of the original Big 3, now appears to be out of reach. Iowa has swung to Kerry. Additionally, WI has moved to more than +2 Kerry for the first time in weeks. NV now projects to a closer race than WI and is therefore moved to the current battleground along with WI, IA, NM, FL and OH. This leaves 64 possibilities where Kerry wins 43, Bush wins 20 and 3 ties which also count as a Bush win.
It also looks like the magic national popular number has returned to 0.6% that Kerry's votes must exceed Bush's to win Florida, the continuing middle state - the same percentage by which Gore won the populur vote in 2000.
A note about the incumbent rule whic says undecided usually break heavily to the challenger: This is almost always true when the challenger is less well known in the region being contested, which is clearly true of Kerry. An example where it may not hold is if the challenger was also a national figure. For example, Hillary Clinton would not benefit as much as Kerry from the incumbent rule. This rule also applies to state or local races - for example - I would not expect former Governor Knowles to benefit from the incumbent rule in the Alaskan senate race.
Kerry 58,623,000 50.0% 291 EV
Bush 56,653,000 48.4% 247 EV
Other 1,872,000 1.6%
click here for electoral map
Probability Bush wins each state:
WI 20.3%
IA 33.1%
NM 34.6%
FL 37.3%
OH 56.8%
NV 75.7%
Overall Winning Probability:
Kerry 76.7% Bush 23.3%
Today showed continued improvement for Kerry in the battleground while national numbers remained flat. PA, one of the original Big 3, now appears to be out of reach. Iowa has swung to Kerry. Additionally, WI has moved to more than +2 Kerry for the first time in weeks. NV now projects to a closer race than WI and is therefore moved to the current battleground along with WI, IA, NM, FL and OH. This leaves 64 possibilities where Kerry wins 43, Bush wins 20 and 3 ties which also count as a Bush win.
It also looks like the magic national popular number has returned to 0.6% that Kerry's votes must exceed Bush's to win Florida, the continuing middle state - the same percentage by which Gore won the populur vote in 2000.
A note about the incumbent rule whic says undecided usually break heavily to the challenger: This is almost always true when the challenger is less well known in the region being contested, which is clearly true of Kerry. An example where it may not hold is if the challenger was also a national figure. For example, Hillary Clinton would not benefit as much as Kerry from the incumbent rule. This rule also applies to state or local races - for example - I would not expect former Governor Knowles to benefit from the incumbent rule in the Alaskan senate race.
Comments:
Post a Comment